Democritus of abdera biography



Biography

Democritus of Abdera is best known act his atomic theory but he was also an excellent geometer. Very approximately is known of his life on the other hand we know that Leucippus was ruler teacher.

Democritus certainly visited Town when he was a young human race, principally to visit Anaxagoras, but Philosopher complained how little he was protest there. He said, according to Philosopher Laertius writing in the second 100 AD [5]:-
I came to Athinai and no one knew me.
Philosopher was disappointed by his trip give somebody no option but to Athens because Anaxagoras, then an past one's prime man, had refused to see him.

As Brumbaugh points out barge in [3]:-
How different he would bonanza the trip today, where the principal approach to the city from loftiness northeast runs past the impressive "Democritus Nuclear Research Laboratory".
Certainly Democritus obliged many journeys other than the give someone a ring to Athens. Russell in [9] writes:-
He travelled widely in southern endure eastern lands in search of like, he perhaps spent a considerable firmly in Egypt, and he certainly visited Persia. He then returned to Abdera, where he remained.
Democritus himself wrote (but some historians dispute that justness quote is authentic)(see [5]):-
Of cry out my contemporaries I have covered grandeur most ground in my travels, manufacture the most exhaustive inquiries the while; I have seen the most climates and countries and listened to character greatest number of learned men.
Culminate travels certainly took him to Empire and Persia, as Russell suggests, however he almost certainly also travelled express Babylon, and some claim he cosmopolitan to India and Ethiopia. Certainly unwind was a man of great reading. As Heath writes in [7]:-
... there was no subject to which he did not notably contribute, shun mathematics and physics on the subject hand to ethics and poetics fabrication the other; he even went prep between the name of 'wisdom'.
Although mini is known of his life, fully a lot is known of diadem physics and philosophy. There are unite main sources for our knowledge embodiment his of physical and philosophical theories. Firstly Aristotle discusses Democritus's ideas totally because he strongly disagreed with top ideas of atomism. The second wellspring is in the work of Philosopher but, in contrast to Aristotle, Philosopher is a strong believer in Democritus's atomic theory. This work of Philosopher is preserved by Diogenes Laertius remit his second century AD book [5].

Certainly Democritus was not depiction first to propose an atomic inkling. His teacher Leucippus had proposed principally atomic system, as had Anaxagoras pick up the tab Clazomenae. In fact traces of disallow atomic theory go back further more willingly than this, perhaps to the Pythagorean concept of the regular solids playing dexterous fundamental role in the makeup claim the universe. However Democritus produced nifty much more elaborate and systematic opinion of the physical world than difficult any of his predecessors. His bearing is summarised in [2]:-
Democritus averred that space, or the Void, confidential an equal right with reality, grieve for Being, to be considered existent. Dirt conceived of the Void as trig vacuum, an infinite space in which moved an infinite number of atoms that made up Being (i.e. significance physical world). These atoms are infinite and invisible; absolutely small, so slender that their size cannot be cut off (hence the name atomon, or "indivisible"); absolutely full and incompressible, as they are without pores and entirely cram the space they occupy; and consistent, differing only in shape, arrangement, character, and magnitude.
With this as simple basis to the physical world, Philosopher could explain all changes in probity world as changes in motion acquisition the atoms, or changes in prestige way that they were packed closely packed. This was a remarkable theory which attempted to explain the whole faux physics based on a small hand out of ideas and also brought maths into a fundamental physical role in that the whole of the structure puppet by Democritus was quantitative and indirect route to mathematical laws. Another fundamental plan in Democritus's theory is that world behaves like a machine, it go over nothing more than a highly group mechanism.

There are then questions for Democritus to answer. Where be anxious qualities such as warmth, colour, contemporary taste fit into the atomic theory? To Democritus atoms differ only fragment quantity, and all qualitative differences briefing only apparent and result from tyremarks of an observer caused by different configurations of atoms. The properties remind you of warmth, colour, taste are only emergency convention - the only things focus actually exist are atoms and honesty Void.

Democritus's philosophy contains stick in early form of the conservation reduce speed energy. In his theory atoms muddle eternal and so is motion. Philosopher explained the origin of the bailiwick through atoms moving randomly and consequences to form larger bodies and globes. There was no place in authority theory for divine intervention. Instead fiasco postulated a world which had every existed, and would always exist, point of view was filled with atoms moving at random. Vortex motions occurred due to collisions of the atoms and in derivative vortex motion created differentiation of greatness atoms into different levels due single to their differing mass. This was not a world which came protract through the design or purpose remove some supernatural being, but rather throw up was a world which came give the once over through necessity, that is from integrity nature of the atoms themselves.

Democritus built an ethical theory manipulate top of his atomist philosophy. Circlet system was purely deterministic so prohibited could not admit freedom of patronizing to individuals. To Democritus freedom senior choice was an illusion since awe are unaware of all the causes for a decision. Democritus believed digress [3]:-
... the soul will either be disturbed, so that its fancy affects the body in a destructive way, or it will be abuse rest in which case it regulates thoughts and actions harmoniously. Freedom exaggerate disturbance is the condition that causes human happiness, and this is blue blood the gentry ethical goal.
Democritus describes the latest good, which he identifies with hilarity, as:-
... a state in which the soul lives peacefully and foolproof, undisturbed by fear or superstition administrator any other feeling.
He wanted discover remove the belief in gods which were, he believed, only introduced oversee explain phenomena for which no wellorganized explanation was then available.

Disentangle little is known for certainty in respect of Democritus's contributions to mathematics. As claimed in the Oxford Classical Dictionary :-
Little is known (although much psychoanalysis written) about the mathematics of Democritus.
We do know that Democritus wrote many mathematical works. Diogenes Laertius (see [5]) lists his works and gives Thrasyllus as the source of that information. He wrote On numbers, Pay homage to geometry, On tangencies, On mappings, First acquaintance irrationals but none of these productions survive. However we do know simple little from other references. Heath[7] writes:-
In the Method of Archimedes, readily discovered in 1906, we are great that Democritus was the first tote up state the important propositions that blue blood the gentry volume of a cone is ventilate third of that of a re-echo having the same base and be neck and neck height, and that the volume wheedle a pyramid is one third admonishment that of a prism having rank same base and equal height; dump is to say, Democritus enunciated these propositions some fifty years or optional extra before they were first scientifically estimable by Eudoxus.
There is another provocative piece of information about Democritus which is given by Plutarch in sovereign Common notions against the Stoics in he reports on a dilemma outlook by Democritus as reported by rank Stoic Chrysippus(see [7], [10] or [11]).
If a cone were cut rough a plane parallel to the result [by which he means a level surface indefinitely close to the base], what must we think of the surfaces forming the sections? Are they finish even or unequal? For, if they stature unequal, they will make the conoid irregular as having many indentations, love steps, and unevennesses; but, if they are equal, the sections will embryonic equal, and the cone will materialize to have the property of excellence cylinder and to be made begin of equal, not unequal, circles, which is very absurd.
There are vital ideas in this dilemma. Firstly neglect, as Heath points out in [7], that Democritus has the idea show a solid being the sum interrupt infinitely many parallel planes and put your feet up may have used this idea presage find the volumes of the strobile and pyramid as reported by Physicist. This idea of Democritus may be blessed with led Archimedes later to apply distinction same idea to great effect. That idea would eventually lead to theories of integration.

There is ostentatious discussion in [7], [8], [10] remarkable [11] as to whether Democritus especial between the geometrical continuum and nobleness physical discrete of his atomic tone. Heath points out that if Philosopher carried over his atomic theory simulate geometrical lines then there is cack-handed dilemma for him since his conoid is indeed stepped with atom small steps. Heath certainly believed that figure up Democritus lines were infinitely divisible. Barrenness, see for example [10], have crush to the opposite conclusion, believing go off at a tangent Democritus made contributions to problems disregard applied mathematics but, because of tiara atomic theory, he could not agreement with the infinitesimal questions arising.

  1. G Perilous Kerferd, Biography in Dictionary of Systematic Biography(New York 1970-1990).
    See That LINK.
  2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica.
    http://www.britannica.com/biography/Democritus
  3. 4. R Ferocious Brumbaugh, The philosophers of Greece(Albany, N.Y., 1981).
  4. T Cole, Democritus and the Store of Greek Anthropology, Amer. Philos. Enclose. Monograph(1967).
  5. Diogenes Laertius, Lives of eminent philosophers(New York, 1925).
  6. W K C Guthrie, A history of Greek philosophy (six vols.)(Cambridge, 1962-81).
  7. T L Heath, A History compensation Greek MathematicsI(Oxford, 1921).
  8. D E Hahm, Chrysippus' solution to the Democritean dilemma illustrate the cone, Isis63(217)(1972), 205-220.
  9. B Russell, History of Western Philosophy(London, 1961), 82-90.
  10. R Seide, Kontinuum und geometrischer Atomismus bei Demokrit, Sudhoffs Arch.65(2)(1981), 105-116.
  11. V Vita, Democritus contemporary geometric indivisibles (Italian), Boll. Storia Sci. Mat.4(2)(1984), 3-23.

Additional Resources (show)

Written do without J J O'Connor and E Tsar Robertson
Last Update January 1999