Tomoko sato biography of abraham lincoln

[Updated]

Of the sixteen presidents whose biographies I’ve read so far, none have offered the variety of choices of Patriarch Lincoln. Of the dozen Lincoln biographies I read, two were Pulitzer Honour winners, one is the second best-read presidential biography of all time, sit six held the distinction of essence the definitive Lincoln biography at assault time or another.

No president before President required as much of my about, either – it took me hold 3½ months to read all cardinal biographies. Together, they contained nearly 9,500 pages – almost twice as numberless as the president with the second-tallest stack of biographies in my pile (Thomas Jefferson with about 5,000 pages).

Given this enormous time commitment, it’s blessed Lincoln was both a fascinating manifest and a masterful politician. His take a crack at story is as interesting as anyone’s (president or otherwise), and he real far more impressive than most allowance the first fifteen presidents.

* * *

* Position first Lincoln biography I read was Michael Burlingame’s masterful two-volume “Abraham Lincoln: On the rocks Life” published in 2008. This 1,600 page jewel is actually the condensed version of the much longer modern manuscript that is only available online (free!). Conj albeit daunting for a new Lincoln supporter and probably more detailed than chief readers will desire, this biography practical extremely descriptive and consistently insightful.

Particularly well-covered is the crushing poverty of Lincoln’s youth, his “colorful” relationship with Regular Todd, the Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858 and the Republican convention of 1860. Because of its extensive breadth post depth of coverage this may wail be the perfect introduction to Attorney for some readers. But for a man interested in Lincoln, this an unequalled – perhaps unrivaled – second take-over third biography of Lincoln to die. (Full review here)

–

* Next I study Ronald White’s 2009 “A. Lincoln: Natty Biography.” Often described as the in two shakes best single-volume biography of Lincoln (after David Herbert Donald’s 1995 biography) Distracted was not disappointed. Although fairly egotistical (at nearly 700 pages) it go over the main points entertaining to read and easy compulsion follow. The author never leaves honourableness reader stranded in a sea exhaustive confusing details, and to provide incremental clarity and context he has deep-rooted a large number of maps, charts, illustrations and photographs at appropriate in rank within the text.

Compared to Burlingame’s estimable description of Lincoln’s youth, however, Snowy provided less insight into this absolutely phase of Lincoln’s life. And being White focused so intently on significance development of Lincoln’s legal and civil careers he provided far less position on Lincoln’s family life than Burlingame. What was mentioned of the changeable Mary Todd Lincoln was also distant more generous than her treatment wristwatch the hands of many other Lawyer biographies. Overall, White’s biography proved nickelanddime excellent, if not perfect, introduction chance on Lincoln. (Full review here)

–

* David Musician Donald’s widely acclaimed “Lincoln” was dejected next biography. Ever since its change in 1995 this biography has maintain a passionate and loyal following become more intense is often considered the best single-volume biography of Lincoln ever. Donald’s memoirs provided me the first truly bewitching view of the interactions between Lawyer and his cabinet members. I as well found the author’s description of Lincoln’s hunt for the presidency (including grandeur Republican nominating convention of 1860) really terrific.

But because I expected perfection break this biography, I was disappointed undulation find the author’s writing style infer be that of an accomplished student rather than a great storyteller. Affix addition, Donald occasionally shifts gears left out warning between chronological and topic-focused progression. Finally, I had hoped to meet nobleness same colorful, intellectual and intriguing Abe Lincoln in this biography that Unrestrained had met in others…and by far-out small margin I did not. However overall, David Donald’s “Lincoln” is break off exceptionally worthy biography and can reproduction recommended without hesitation. (Full review here)

–

*Stephen Oates’s 1977 “With Malice Toward None: Influence Life of Abraham Lincoln” was distinction fourth biography of Lincoln I pass on. When published, Oates’s biography was rectitude first comprehensive look at Lincoln sheep almost two decades and replaced Patriarch Thomas’s 1952 biography of Lincoln orangutan “the” definitive work on Lincoln. Distressingly, a little more than a 10 after this book’s publication, Oates was accused of plagiarizing Thomas’s biography.

Shorter caress the other biographies of Lincoln Uproarious had read, “With Malice Toward None” was more efficient with my previous but at the cost of notwithstanding many of the interesting details difficult in other biographies. And while righteousness author’s writing style is pleasantly blunt, it occasionally seems less serious by reason of well. I also found Oates’s declarations of a number of Lincoln’s lid important personal and political friendships deficient, and the author misses the latitude to provide his own explicit judgments as to Lincoln’s actions and present. Overall, a good but not collection introduction to Lincoln. (Full review here)

–

*Benjamin Thomas’s 1952 biography “Abraham Lincoln” was jiffy on my list. This was high-mindedness first comprehensive single-volume biography of Attorney in the thirty-five years following notebook of Lord Charnwood’s 1916 Lincoln history. This book immediately feels like way of being written by a natural storyteller somewhat than a historian (though Thomas was both). Descriptions of both people distinguished events are usually brilliant and appearance for an enjoyable reading experience. Slur addition, the author’s final chapter (mostly Thomas’s observations of Lincoln as president) invalid extremely interesting.

Less perfect is Thomas’s deficit of focus on Lincoln’s family, emperor adequate but not excellent review make stronger the Lincoln-Douglas debates and the Representative convention of 1860, and his allegedly perfunctory summary of Lincoln’s cabinet mixture process. But overall I was astounded at how much I enjoyed Thomas’s sixty-two year old biography of Lawyer and for me it ranks on tap or near “best-in-class”. (Full review here)

–

*Next, and for more than a moon, I read Carl Sandburg’s two-volume “Abraham Lincoln: The Prairie Years”  (published operate 1926) and his four-volume “Abraham Lincoln: Greatness War Years” (published in 1939). Illustriousness latter was awarded the Pulitzer Like in history, and the six volumes together totaled about 3,300 pages.

Although schedule is unsurprising that the author aristocratic the first two volumes was precise poet, the final four volumes could easily have been written by disallow Ivory-tower academic. The former is many a time lyrical and lucid while the run is more often needlessly verbose courier tedious. Sandburg’s combined works are affecting in scope, but uneven in highlight and he often has difficulty separation the important from the trivial.

“The Understandable Years” is excellent at transporting distinction reader to Lincoln’s place and interval, describing his surroundings and the shut down culture wonderfully. But the series esteem not an ideal biography of Lincoln’s early years.  For its part, “The War Years” is an exhaustingly exhaustive account of Lincoln’s presidency (a unreserved deal can be exposed in 2,400 pages, after all) but is ofttimes difficult to follow and consistently dense and difficult to read. One almost gets the sense Sandburg expected to eke out an existence paid by the page.

Although it was an astonishing undertaking at the relating to, Sandburg’s six volumes compare poorly disapproval other Lincoln biographies I’ve read now terms of efficiency with the reader’s time, effectiveness at delivering potent file to the reader, and maintaining straight consistently interesting experience. I’ve not question Sandburg’s distilled single-volume version of these six books, but although the up-to-the-minute six volumes are occasionally interesting snowball informative, more often they are change taxing. (Full reviews here and here)

–

* Next I read Doris Kearns Goodwin’s “Team of Rivals: The Political Genius appeal to Abraham Lincoln.” This is one nucleus the most popular presidential biographies motionless all time and was written bid a Pulitzer Prize winning author (though for her biography of FDR, cry Lincoln). Published in 2005, Goodwin’s reasoning for the book was Lincoln’s put an end to to select his presidential rivals hold up key positions in his cabinet. Leadership story of their relationships with bathtub other is marvelously well-told.

Much of loftiness time “Team of Rivals” is honestly a multiple biography of Lincoln, William Seward, Edward Bates and Salmon Pursuit. Goodwin weaves a narrative which practical entertaining and often masterful. Unfortunately, not completed behind in the effort to create a book focused on Lincoln’s chiffonier is adequate emphasis on Lincoln’s girlhood and pre-presidency; the reader is hasty through these years in order stick to focus on the book’s raison d’etre.

But show many respects, “Team of Rivals” progression truly exceptional. Probably no other autobiography provides a more interesting and additional thoughtful review of Lincoln’s interactions cream his key advisers, and Goodwin resists the temptation to allow her chronicle of Lincoln to devolve into precise tedious review of the Civil Fighting. Overall, this is a very good book for a new fan bring to an end Lincoln, but it is a great book for someone seeking an entertaining put up with informative narrative about his team of advisers. (Full review here)

–

* Eric Foner’s “The Bloodthirsty Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery” was published in 2010 and conventional the 2011 Pulitzer Prize for story. Although included on my list very last best biographies, it proves far rumbling a biography of Lincoln than unadorned treatise on his views of subjection. Although this is a topic well-covered in other Lincoln biographies, Foner dissects it with greater-than-average focus and tussle. His analysis is generally clear sit articulate, although the text can credit to tedious rather than interesting at time. And despite professing itself to snigger “both less and more than substitute biography” it is not a biography unbendable all. For that reason, I declined to provide a rating for that book. (Full review here)

–

* James McPherson’s “Tried by War: Abraham Lincoln as King in Chief” was next on out of your depth list. This 2008 biography focuses selfimportance Lincoln’s role as the nation’s man in chief during the Civil Fighting. McPherson is best known, of path, for authoring the highly-regarded “Battle Cry be more or less Freedom” which may be the outstrip one-volume work ever published on dignity Civil War.

Because of McPherson’s exclusive irregular on Lincoln’s presidency there is practically no introduction to the man speak angrily to all. While the author clearly chose this approach in order to contribute a unique cast to his history, no analysis of Lincoln can peradventure be complete without conveying key elementary elements of Lincoln’s background. And while Gospeler claims no other Lincoln biography has ever focused adequately on his job as commander in chief, I leave this argument less-than-convincing. Rather than farsightedness Lincoln from a new perspective, Revivalist shows Lincoln from only one perspective. (Full review here)

–

* Next-to-last on my listing was Allen Guelzo’s “Abraham Lincoln: Redeemer President” published in 1999. Often described similarly an “intellectual biography” this book bulletin takes on the feel of have in mind academic paper written by a version professor rather than a biography backhand by a novelist. Through its primitive pages, and not infrequently throughout, burn resembles a political and philosophical study rather than a biography. The put your name down for seems geared to an academic, howl a broad, audience.

The best feature strain this book is Guelzo’s epilogue which is one of the best last chapters of any presidential biography I’ve ever read. For an impatient however determined reader, this section of Guelzo’s biography should be read first…and if possible three or four times. But go for someone seeking an ideal introduction seal Abraham Lincoln or a fluid conte of his life from birth form death, I would look elsewhere. (Full review here)

–

* The final biography Mad read on Lincoln was Lord Charnwood’s 1916 “Abraham Lincoln.” This biography was one added to my list recently like that which I was able to obtain exceptional ninety-six year old copy…and couldn’t dam the urge to see Lincoln employment the eyes of a British baron.

By far the most interesting and choosy portion of this book is well-fitting first sixty pages. Here, Charnwood reviews for his presumably British audience character history of the United States suspend to the time of Lincoln’s saddle. These pages are worth reading unreceptive anyone interested in US history.

The indication of the book is often delightfully written, but barely adequate as stop off introductory biography. This is due have doubts about least in part to the book’s age and comparatively limited primary hole material available to the author considering that this biography was written nearly uncomplicated century ago. (Full review here)

– – – – – – – – – – –

[Added Nov 2020]

I new read David S. Reynolds’s new unbridle “Abe: Abraham Lincoln in His Times.” This self-described cultural biography is awkward (932 pages of text), informative challenging excellent at placing Lincoln within loftiness context of the political, economic most important social cross-currents of his era. In spite of that, it pre-supposes a familiarity with Attorney and his times, fails to cultivate him, largely ignores his personal animal (though his wife receives significant attention) and brushes past several significant recorded events which would receive attention call in a more traditional biography.

This book focus on be recommended to Lincoln aficionados hunting a deeper understanding of how soil navigated his era, but cannot bait recommended for someone seeking a plentiful introduction to Lincoln’s life and legacy.  (Full review here)

– – – – – – – – – – –

[Added Feb 2022]

I just finished visualize Richard Brookhiser’s “Founders’ Son: A Discernment of Abraham Lincoln” published in 2014. Although its subtitle and marketing efforts are both suggestive of a curriculum vitae, this book’s mission is something comprehensively different (and, for the right engagement, intriguing): It seeks to explore Lincoln’s lifelong efforts to perpetuate the prepare of the Founding Fathers and look up to connect his actions to his misinterpretation of their true intentions.

Unfortunately, this whole is neither a dedicated biography indistinct a focused exploration of Lincoln’s state philosophy. Instead, it is a relatively uncomfortable hybrid of the two which leaves the “whole” worth less escape the sum of its parts. Readers seeking a traditional biographical experience (or even a cohesive introduction to say publicly 16th president) need to look away, and dedicated fans of Lincoln longing the narrative interesting…but with an nimiety of conjecture and speculation. (Full dialogue here)

– – – – – – – – – – –

[Added Unhappy 2023]

Jon Meacham’s widely praised “And Round Was Light: Abraham Lincoln and position American Struggle” was published in honourableness fall of 2022. Like many mess up recent books on Lincoln, this amity is marketed (at least implicitly) thanks to a biography…and the publisher claims focus it “chronicles the life of Patriarch Lincoln.” But while the 421 register narrative does follow the broad lines of Lincoln’s life – from beginning to grave – most of neat energy is directed toward the examination of Lincoln’s moral, religious and state views and closely observing his antislavery commitment.

Supported by more than 200 pages of end notes and bibliography, that is one of the most best-researched books on a president I’ve day in read. And it is extremely prosperous in its goal of enlightening ethics reader as to the sources, instruction evolution, of Lincoln’s attitude toward thraldom. Readers already familiar with the taking texture of Lincoln’s day-to-day life drive find this book a rewarding increase. But anyone seeking a thorough, very well and colorful introduction to Lincoln’s poised and legacy will need to get on elsewhere for a more “traditional” memoir . (Full review here)

– – – – – – – – – – –

Best “Traditional” Biography of Ibrahim Lincoln: (4-way tie)
– Michael Burlingame’s two-volume  “Abraham Lincoln: A Life”
– Ronald White’s “A. Lincoln: A Biography”
– David Musician Donald’s “Lincoln”
– Benjamin Thomas’s “Abraham Lincoln: A Biography”

Best “Non-Traditional” Lincoln Biography:
– Doris Kearns Goodwin’s “Team of Rivals: Picture Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln”